![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Informal LearningScience Alliance and informal learning |
||||||||||
| To contrast informal learning with formal learning, or informal education with formal education, illuminates the difference between structured, graded, credited, accredited classroom learning and the kind of free-choice, self-driven, painless learning people do in museums, at science centers, during visits to campus, and anywhere in life where an experience leads them to retain a new understanding of the universe they live in. Making the distinction is important because formal education institutions such as the University of Wisconsin-Madison are not perceived as sources of informal learning The irony is that research at the university is an excellent example of informal learning: the individual pursues an interest and inquires and investigates. | |||||||||||
| Land-grant Universities such as UW-Madison are also major sources of information and experiences for the informal learner. UW-Madison serves informal learners through on-campus experiences and mass media, including press releases to newspapers and magazines, radio and television, and websites. | The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has announced a new program within the Child Development and Behavior Branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development which encourages both basic and intervention research in the areas of mathematics and science learning and cognition. | ||||||||||
| Our challenge is to make the University of Wisconsin-Madison a more welcoming place for the informal learner. The UW-Madison's research mission can be viewed as a process of informal learning: the researcher independently investigates a question of interest. Ultimately, we envision UW-Madison as a model for an intentional process of leveraging the formal resources of a major educational and scientific research institution into a thriving resource for informal science education for learners of all ages. | |||||||||||
| Other pages on this site describe ideas for this leveraging process, such as "Campus as a Destination," and "Learning Lobbies", the successful"Science Expeditions" series of events, the idea of a Science Museum for Madison, and the Forum on the Future of Science Outreach in the 21st Century. What follows here is a brief discussion of some of the cognitive differences between informal learning and formal learning, and useful links for further study on the topic. | |||||||||||
How different is informal learning? | |||||||||||
| In the University environment, we've all seen students raise their hands and ask "Will this be on the test?" The obvious implication is, if the topic of the question is not going to be on the test, the student isn't going to bother to learn it. This illustrates one important difference about informal learning -- the learner is a volunteer, is self-driven, and wants to learn the subject matter to integrate it into his or her own world view. Informal learning is less likely to be forgotten after final exams are over, in part because there is no final. | ![]() | ||||||||||
| Cognitive science is just beginning to be able to quantify the differences between informal learning. It may be that directly comparing informal and formal learning is not useful because they differ so profoundly. The Science Alliance intends to contribute to knowledge about informal learning, and into how outreachers can better organize experiences for informal learners. Below are a few stimulating web sites on informal learning. Please, if you know of or find others, let us know so we can make this resource even more valuable. —contributed by Ken Smith |
|||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Science.Wisc.Edu Home | UW Home
File last updated: September 18, 2003 Feedback, questions or accessibility issues: kennethsmith@wisc.edu Copyright © 2003 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. |
|||||||||||